Well, itโs because many of our ingredients areโฆโ
โForaged?โ I interjected.
โYes, and we want people to relax and feel free toโฆโ
โChatter?โ
โYes.โ
You know when you ask a stupid question about a restaurantโs name, when itโs very self explanatory? Thatโs my hobby. I always do it.
You never know, I could have found out this place, in the former premises of Edinburgh Larder Bistro, is owned by Ms Forage and Mr Chatter, or that its name has an obscure literary reference (see Edinburgh cafe Love Crumbs, whose namesake is a poem by EE Cummings), maybe to a book about macaques.
Anyway, talking lots is not something I like to do over food. Iโll do it inbetween mouthfuls, of course, but too much of it and a dish can disappear without you even tasting it.
My friend Claire understands that. We catch up when the plates are clear.
On this visit, we were engrossed and almost completely chatter free, even when we burnt our fingertips on the amuse bouche of savoury doughnut-esque South African fried bread rolls.
Though a potential appetite assassinator, these were lovely, with pesto on the side as well as a scoop of butter sprinkled with an ash-coloured mushroom powder.
Munch-munch, no talky.
Our imaginative starters, chosen from the ร la carte menu (though thereโs also a two course lunch deal for ยฃ14.95, three for ยฃ17.95), also required a bit of meditative concentration.
Sheโd gone for the veggie option of mushroom carpaccio (ยฃ8.50), which featured fat beefy slabs of white mushroom flesh, a cushion of mushroom purรฉe, three breadcrumbed bollards of goatโs cheese, sorrel leaves, a mushy purรฉe and a mushy powder.
Great flavours. The only weird thing was that the fromage bonbons were hot, and everything else fridge cold.
Lack of heat also took the shine off the BBQ pork shoulder (ยฃ8.50) offering. It was barely tepid. However, it was a winner otherwise, with five-spiced soft pig, battered squid tentacles, thinly sliced florets and radish petals sinking into a moussey cloud of cauliflower purรฉe, like disco dancers being enveloped by dry ice.
My main of monkfish (ยฃ17.50) was only slightly warmer than my starter, though it was still good comfort eating for those who like sweet savouries, with draught excluder sized chunks of spiced fish, a squash purรฉe, toasted seeds and a bay-infused melted butter moat.
Claire went for pearl barley (ยฃ15) โ a creamy risotto with chives and nanoparticle-sized bits of veg, plus cubes of roasted celeriac, kale, more blobs of the balsamic-y onion purรฉe and slippery onion bits. Maybe it needed a bit more depth, but it was a more than decent veggie option.
Skim-reading has a lot to answer for. Iโd gone for the โpear, prune, thyme and hazelnut crumblesโ (ยฃ6) because Iโd read it as crumble, as in โoooh, crumble and custard, nice on a wintery day like thisโ.
It turned out to be a cold and very sweet prune compote with accompaniments of sliced poached pear and a spoonful of a light crispy granola-ish crumble. Very nice, but in a breakfast-time way.
Claire chose the Valrhona chocolate (ยฃ6). It resembled a cream-splashed stegosaurus, with a segmented body of rich ganache quenelles, and spines made from peanutty biscuit bits that tasted like compressed honeycomb studded with peanut scales.
Not fair. Thatโs the one Iโd have chosen, if Claire hadnโt bagged it. Instead, I had to work my way through a cold crumble that had never even been one in the first place.
That killed the chat stone dead. Still, I suppose Forage & Ignore Each Other Over Lunch Because Youโre Enjoying the Food and She Bagged the Best Dessert, doesnโt have quite the same ring to it.
Lunch for two, excluding drinks, ยฃ61.50
